A cool idea for the serious photographer and social-media participant.
Near the beginning of the essay
“From Analysis to Design: Visual Communication in the Teaching of Writing,”
written by Diana George, she shares the idea that tension exists within
electronic modes of expression, specifically between writing and images.
She writes, “I actually believe
that some tug of war between words and images or between writing and design can
be productive as it brings into relief the multiple dimensions of all forms of
communication.”
As a visual-writer – a phrase my
fingers just typed, which means this author (as most other social-media
participants) creates documents using design and text together electronically
on a daily basis. Ironically, the concepts of writing and text, versus
photographs and graphics or design appear to be innately opposite on the
surface. The two mediums require different sets of skills for understanding and
interpreting, yet scholars such as George, and The New London Group state that
writing and visuals work together as a unit, and both help to develop more-relatable
multi-modal designs. According to scholars, the use of mass media, beginning
with the originally perceived threat of television’s passivity in the mid-20th
century, all really seem to connect the dots for students, and inspire new and
more interests for them, rather than lead students astray. And, the 21st
century student has grown up in a visually aggressive culture therefore
combining writing with visual components intuitively, innately almost, and
possibly modern students understand writing better delivered in this way …than
text without any design element.
Wordsmiths have argued for a longtime the superiority of words over pictures because of the directness of writing.
And, the communication of meaning through images, graphics and layout, as in
advertising for example, were historically treated as a genre to critique
George states, not one that incorporated and imparted subtle meanings. As time
has passed though with the growth of technologically mature audiences, it is
now understood that employing both images and words is a form of communication
all its own – this revelation was a long-time coming. She makes sense when stating
that the image, photograph or graphics becomes the “central thesis,” or main
idea, such as in the traditional
argumentative essay students are assigned. And as mentioned above, students are
probably more visually sensitive today as opposed to verbally
sensitive due to television, computer and Internet exposure. But,
despite the obvious changes of mankind, George questions and states rhetorically,
halfway through her essay what every teacher of writing composition must:
“Are images strategies for getting
students to pay attention to detail? Do they mimic the rhetoric of verbal
argument? Are they a dumbing down of writing instruction making visible to
nonverbal students what the verbally gifted can conceptualize? Certainly, there
is the message in much of this work that images may be useful, even proper
stimuli for writing, but they are no substitute for the complexity of
language.”
George continues though, by
discussing David Bartholomae and Anthony Petrosky’s reprinting of a portion of
John Berger’s Ways of Seeing in their 1987 composition reader “Ways of
Reading.” She states a writer’s language is absolutely linked with the visual arts, according to these two authors.
“That idea, that images are not a reflection of a fixed reality, that,
instead, our ways of
understanding the world around us are somehow commingled with how we represent the
world visually was a notion that appealed to teachers of writing like
Bartholomae and Petroskey who were searching for ways of incorporating cultural
theory into the composition classroom.”
She also writes that as humans
we have progressed in many scientific and linguistic areas including cognitive
psychology, neurophysiology, semiotics …and writing and visual thinking have
proven to be used in combination. Maybe writing has always been a visual
language? Is design the act of producing literacy in a material form? Born
before computers, and growing up during the development of modern technology
and a witness to what is now a mobile-phone society, this writer agrees with
George that the advent of desktop
publishing may be the pivotal point that changed the face of teaching writing - pushing it into a design world. The
transformation of knowledge has become one that occurs through a
redesign says George. An electronic Internet document is now focused on colors, font,
placement, space, and images to assist the controlling theme of a piece of writing.
As a means of understanding writing, teachers and society are now paying
attention to a more visual way of thinking.
George has shown that the
focus of writing will continue to merge composition with design and there is no
turning back. She states the new questions to be answered will be: Does the visual make an argument? How well
does the visual communicate that argument? Is the argument relevant to the
course and to the assignment? Is it interesting, clear or focused? This writer is convinced that literacy
practice intertwined with the production and distribution of text …and the
visual arts all together create the 21st century composer’s work.
No comments:
Post a Comment