Jeff Bezemer and Gunther Kress’s “ Writing in Multimodal Texts: A social Semiotic Account of Designs for
Learning” analyzed textbooks published between 1930 and 2005. They observed the mode of images and its role
in teaching and learning. They also considered the pros and cons in the design
of representation of these textbooks between the above-mentioned times. They,
in addition, hashed out the mode of image and sound and their function in
multimodal compositions, for example Web-based textbooks. They insinuated that
these multimodal compositions are socially and culturally shaped, thus meaning
making is socially and culturally based.
Bezemer and Kress believe that writing is being displaced by
image as the central mode for presentation (233). The point that images can compliment texts in
meaning making is to acknowledge an important shift in how textbooks used to be
designed in the past and, how there have been paradigm shifts in the present designs
of textbooks. Design here refers to the
principles of composition. The compositions of textbooks with pages on Web
dealing with the same issues have greater effects when writing is combined with
images claim Bezemer and Kress (234). It is a fact that textbooks creators have
understand that the visuals are an important part in meaning making especially
to students who are between elementary and secondary levels.
Bezemer and Kress put forward two concepts, which discusses
the change in the design of representations, transformation and
transduction. A transformation refers to
the changes in mode (235). Mode is the
“socially and culturally shaped resource for making meaning.” Examples of this
are images, writing, layout, speech and moving images. Modes also have modal resources, for example,
in writing its syntax or grammar; in images its font type, size color, shape,
or icons; speech has loudness, pitch, tone and so on. Speech and writing share the resources of
syntax, grammar and lexis. Transduction refers
to the changes within a mode. It also means the move across modes for example
using multimedia as a means of distributing media (235).
It seems that mode and medium, another concept, are similar.
They are supposedly considered together but there are subtle differences. Medium is the material through which meaning
becomes available. Thus, computers are a part in the meaning making (238). Computers, newspapers, billboards, radio and
television, to list a few are a part of meaning making. Bezemer and Kress
describe the frames available as mediums for example the space on blank sheet
of paper or the double page spread in a book (239).
The combining of images and texts is something that was new
and trendy at the turn of the 21st century. There is a greater shift in the changing
modes and media which Bezemer and Kress pointed out in their three examples of
Transduction (242-255). The first
example being, the use of an image of a protractor to teach measuring angles in
a textbook (242-243). This proved there were losses in specificity that is,
missing out on tactile experiences of the actor per se, that is, lining up the
protractor (artifact) with the vertex and ensuring that the baseline also lines
up without shifting the vertex resulting in an inaccurate measurement. On the other hand, the change in the modes
from action to Moving image and speech utilizes the artifact and action and the
use of moving image for the transduction of artifact and action the use of
moving image for the transduction of action which enhances learning not really
dumbing it down (245). Thus, learning a
topic online or learning a lesson per se on YouTube video may nail a concept
faster for a student on the same concept than if one would read a textbook
which may or may not use illustrations. The reason being is that meaning making
is made more effective through speech and video. In other words, this is
considered reconceptualization since
“moving meaning material from one context with social organization of
participants and its modal ensembles to another with its different organization
and modal ensembles”(248).
Anne Frances Wysocki in (awaywithwords: On the Possibilities
in Unavailable designs” analyzes connection between modes and media when the
presenter makes a deliberate choice their mode of communication in Bezemer and
Kress. She explains that meaning is also made in a historical sense, along with
the cultural political, social and technological restraints. Thus, medium in
Bezemer and Kress is rather a perceived affordance, dependent on the meaning
maker’s cultural political, social and technological restraints. Hence, there is value in understanding space for multimedia composers. She also went on to show how space in the
design is a big deal, grammatical and for meaning purpose. For example
“awaywithwords” was a sneaky way of getting her point across, when the space
between the words were removed, “a way with words” connotes an entire different
meaning. This wasn’t expected. In fact Wysocki’s point is that “what is
expected by a particular audience in a particular context but also what they
might not expect, what they might not be prepared to see.” Is this the un-designed?
The Web has so many mediums that make allowances for what
students might learn. This is the era of
visual age, where the visual, has gain importance. However, text will still
play an integral role, where both text and visual will aid composition designs.
Bezemer and Kress alluded that “ As frames change, new sites of display are
created.” The frame is the book, or the material, and the site of display
refers to its layout. The author decides on the content and as to whether or
not they have communicated what they need to, using the parameters of those
frames. The computer is a medium. Is the personal computer also a mode? Since,
meaning is interconnected with the designer and meaning maker, that is, those
who are interacting with the various sites of displays on the Web.
Nonetheless, here is another examples of how
transduction works with other modes of transduction. The changing social sites may make a content
area more interesting. Its ability to
get across meaning, is to, realized the value or purpose of the topic being covered
and using visuals including test to convey meaning effectively.
No comments:
Post a Comment